NOTE: For more information about this project, contact Chia Lor at district1chia@gmail.com or by calling 651-578-7400.
This meeting was held at the East Side Freedom Library and
was attended by 21 members of the Saint Paul community including 5 youth from
District 1. The meeting is open to any community members who would like to
actively participate in developing the dialogues planned for this fall between
youth and police, and between community members and city departments.
Welcome by Peter Rachleff of the East Side Freedom Library,
with an explanation of what the library is intended to represent to the
community – a resource on racial and economic justice and its history.
Attendees introduced themselves.
Opening quote by International Association of Chiefs of Police
(IACP) President Richard Beary following
the grand jury’s decision not to indict Officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Mo.:
“At this crucial time, it is
imperative that law enforcement and community leaders, both in Missouri and
through the United States, make every effort to reduce tensions and ensure a
peaceful and lawful response to today’s decision. Only by working together to create a constructive
dialogue can law enforcement and community leaders establish effective
police-community partnerships that are at the heart of safe communities…”
Ground Rules for the meeting were reviewed and participants were asked if
there were any additions or modifications. None were proposed.
The history of the project was reviewed – the four action steps from the
2014 Cross-Cultural dialogues were named (develop an Ambassador Team to spread
the word about the dialogue process, conduct intergenerational dialogues,
develop education around local government and the importance of voting in local
elections, and these community/city department dialogues). Police officers in
attendance asked about whether there has been any discussion of what has
already been going on to improve and support good relations between the police
and the community. These existing efforts will be highlighted in this project.
Work to support this project was identified and a request was made to
have a lead for each set of work:
- How do we partner with schools and churches that have existing youth groups? – C. Ware identified as lead
- How do we use social media to get the word out? – several youth stepped up to work together on this
- How can we pull together the history of police and community relations? J. Lozoya and M. Edwards will be leads from the Police Department
- How do we provide the food and social needs when the dialogues happen? Fundraisers, donations, potlucks? – several youth stepped up to think about this, also B. Leach can act as a resource
- What about community partnerships outside of the district councils? – K. Hallstrom, J. Bandemer, also district council partners can assist with this
- How can youth recruit other youth? – several youth stepped up for this task, but district councils can help make initial connections to other existing youth groups
- How can we make sure that there is transportation available to the dialogues? This will be an on-going discussion.
We want to assure that the dialogues are a diverse and
representative cross-section of our city – by ethnicity, by age, by gender, by
geography. We need to recruit with this in mind.
We already have a strong and supportive relationship with
the police in developing this dialogue. We need to turn our attention to the
other department(s) and community dialogues. After much discussion of the pros
and cons, the overwhelming vote was to focus on the Department of Parks and
Recreation for the second set of dialogues. This decision was made because of
the level of direct impact this department has on community members. The
question was also raised as to whether this dialogue was to be with policy
makers or with front-line staff. We will need to determine this as we get
buy-in from Parks. C. Lor will meet with Parks administrators along with
community members that will include youth. It was emphasized that not only park
users but those who do not use the recreation facilities be included in the
dialogues. Potential questions to ask include – what is privatization or
partnering of facilities and why is it happening as it is? What is the
relationship between the partners and the community? How does the city track
activities or hold partners accountable for the use of public facilities?
We then turned to looking at the dialogue curriculum for the
Police and Community Dialogues. It currently contains 5 sessions – 1) set the
framework and get to know participants and how their experience has shaped
their relationship with police, 2) history of police and community relations
and interpretation of what each of us thinks is happening, 3) what are
expectations of police and of community members for each other? 4) Look for
different ways to improve on relations between community and police, 5) explore
potential action steps and decide on the action steps we want to take. The
organizers/sponsors of this project want to make sure that a session is added
that discusses racial dynamics – taken from the original cross-cultural
dialogues.
We divided into 5 groups, each taking a dialogue session and
thinking about what would work, what we might keep and what we would want to
change in the curriculum. Time ran out, so we will report back on the groups at
the next meeting. (NOTE: this curriculum will also be modified to fit the
dialogues with Parks.)
We finished the meeting with a privilege walk to highlight
the differences in the lived experience of white residents and residents of
color in our community. We discussed the impact of this activity on our
perspectives, and came together by looking at the actions each of us has
already taken and continues to take to narrow the gaps in our experiences.
Next meeting will be at the Western District Police
headquarters, just off University Avenue at Hamline Avenue, 389 Hamline Avenue
North, on Monday June 1 from 5:30p to 7:30p.
No comments:
Post a Comment