January 31, 2013 at Conway Rec Center
In attendance: Kris Gjerde, chair; Chris Dollar-Simmons,
Clara Ware, Erika Martin, Sandy Rosbacka, Kate Staples, Chris Melendez, Melvin
Baker, Kathy Korum, Gwen Peterson, Mike Devilliers, Kathy Lantry, Ellen Biales, Betsy Leach (scribe)
Updates on Outreach
Parks representatives have been trying to schedule outreach
to youth in the area and to the apartment complexes that are immediate
neighbors of Conway Rec Center.
District 1 held a community meeting to take input and also
has met with elders participating in the senior programming at Conway and
individuals. A couple of concerns were uniform among these neighbors. First,
too many of them had not understood that the privatization will proceed once we
have found a service partner. D1 is trying to get the word out of what is
actually happening with this process via the web and our upcoming newspaper.
Second, people want to make sure that Conway expands its role as a community
gathering place. Third, people are concerned with how the partner will
communicate with neighbors, making people aware of what is offered and how they
will be welcomed into the facility. Finally, people want to make sure that
there are year-round activities both inside and outside the building, and
suggest that shared meals at the facility might be a way to continue building
community here.
The elders were concerned with how their program through
Community Ed will interact with the new partner and how they are being kept
informed about this process (Kathy Korum is Parks liaison with Community Ed
administration). Both the elders and the
current sports programs have questions about how equipment will be stored,
maintained and made available to people using the facility.
Demographic Information about the Area
District 1 shared information from the 2010 census about who
lives in the district. They are working with researchers to break this
district-wide information down to the area immediately around the rec center. A
summary of district data with comparisons to the city at large can be found at this
site by clicking on the map for the District 1 neighborhood. Staff also
shared a summary file that compares the percentage of households in each of the
district councils of that have children under the age of 18 and seniors over
the age of 65. This chart shows that District 1, all the other eastside
councils, the westside, North end and Frogtown
(councils 1-7) have much higher percentages of households with young children
than districts on the western side of town (councils 8-17). These data should
be shared with potential partners.
Discussion of the
Draft RFP (Request for Proposals)
The rest of the meeting was spent going through the draft
RFP and discussing the process by which it would be released, proposals
gathered, and then reviewed. The members agreed that emphasis should be on
selling the facility and the neighborhood as a great opportunity to potential partners.
We need to highlight the assets that we have and the particular asset that this
facility represents. We went through the draft page by page and discussed how
it can be written to convey the desires of the community for programming and
opportunities at this location. Discussion centered on how specific we can or
should be and what the priorities for programming should be. Given our goals,
we want to assure leadership and personal development among participants who should
be of all ages and backgrounds. We also want to assure that the partner is a
good neighbor to the community at large.
Specifics of the discussion included what kind of access
there will be, how communication/marketing happens between the partner and the
community, whether the emphasis in programming should be on sports or
education, and the range of partners we might want. We reemphasized that we will find local places
for all current activities that may not be able to remain at Conway. We also
discussed what Parks needs from the partner, the money involved, and what
should be in the RFP vs. in the
contract.
Parks will take all the comments and redraft the RFP for
review at the next meeting (Feb 11).
Please note that the specifics of the RFP cannot be released
to the neighborhood until it is ready to be released to potential partners.
This is a legal requirement of the City’s RFP process. The community should be
assured that the CAG members and District 1 continue to gather input from
residents (and businesses) about what programming should look like at Conway.
Also note that there will be another community meeting where
updates will be provided and input gathered. That meeting will be Monday,
February 25 at 6:30p at Conway Rec Center. You can also contact the district
council to give comments – district1council@aol.com
or 651.578.7600.
3 comments:
Thanks for the wonderful piece of blog. I have come some advice to about Budgeting. Thanks for sharing.....
I'm not a member of the D1 Community, but I'm still trying to understand the concept of privatization. What is the benefit to the community, and the city at large?
Since the rationale for privatization seems to be cost savings, what are the operational and capital costs of the Conway Community? Assuming the same services are provided, what dollar savings will the privatization achieve?
I sincerely thought the purpose of the Conway Community Advisory Group was to first explore continued city and citizen operation of the Community Center versus privatization.
Is there someway that this fundamental question can be made part of the Conway Community Advisory Group agenda and recommendation to the Conway Community?
What are the Parks and Recreation Departments privatization successes? Unfortunately, a recent privatization initiative involved the Margaret Street Rec Center. A failed privatization partnership that ultimately led to the demise and demolition of the Margaret Street Rec Center.
Post a Comment